Betty Dukes -
Submitted for the USGenWeb by Richard P. Sevier July 19, 2017
USGenWeb NOTICE: All
documents placed in the USGenWeb remain
the property of the contributors, who retain publication rights in accordance
with US Copyright Laws and Regulations.
In keeping with our
policy of providing free information on the Internet, these documents may be
used by anyone for their personal research. They may be used by non-commercial
entities, when written permission is obtained from the contributor, so long as
all notices and submitter information are included.
These electronic
pages may NOT be reproduced in any format for profit.
Any other use, including
copying files to other sites, requires permission from the contributors PRIOR
to uploading to the other sites.
*********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Copyright. All rights reserved.
*********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Betty Dukes
Madison
Parish, LA
From New York Times
July 18, 2017
Betty Dukes, Greeter Whose Walmart
Lawsuit Went to Supreme Court, Dies at 67
Betty Dukes, a Walmart worker who led a
class-action lawsuit accusing the company of discriminating against female
employees — a landmark case that went all the way to United States Supreme
Court — died on July 10 at her home in Antioch, Calif. She was 67.
Her death was confirmed on Tuesday by her brother William Ponnell. The cause had not been determined, but she had
recently had heart problems, he said. Ms. Dukes had continued to work for Walmart until her retirement last year, a company spokesman
said.
A Walmart greeter who welcomed customers to the
store, Ms. Dukes was portrayed as the epitome of a low-paid female retail
worker taking on a huge multinational corporation.
“She was a voice fighting for equal rights and against racial and gender
discrimination in the workplace,” her niece Rita Roland said.
The lawsuit was filed in 2001 on behalf of as many as 1.5 million female
workers. Among other discriminatory labor practices, it accused Walmart of a systemic gender
discrimination— paying women less than their male counterparts and of unjustly
passing over women for promotions — all in violation of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, which made it illegal for employers to discriminate on the basis of race,
creed or gender.
But the Supreme Court dismissed the case in 2011 in a 5-4 decision in which
its more conservative justices prevailed.
In the majority opinion, written by Justice Antonin
Scalia, the court ruled that the lawsuit was technically flawed because it had
failed to prove that the women in the class had issues of law or fact in
common.
The five conservative justices were not swayed by statistical and anecdotal
evidence that portrayed Walmart as having
systematically discriminated against its female employees.
Justice Scalia noted that Walmart’s official
corporate policy opposed discrimination, and that the company had given
managers at its more than 3,400 stores considerable discretion over pay and
promotions.
“In a company of Wal-Mart’s size and geographical scope, it is quite
unbelievable that all managers would exercise their discretion in a common way
without some common direction,” Justice Scalia wrote.
But writing for the dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the decision
had gone too far in derailing the Walmart workers’
case. She said that the statistics presented by Ms. Dukes and the other
plaintiffs showed that “gender bias suffused Walmart’s
corporate culture.”
The decision was widely viewed as having made it harder to bring big
employment class-action cases asserting discrimination based on sex, race or
other factors. And it was seen as setting higher barriers for bringing
nationwide class actions against a large company with many branches.
Though the case, Walmart Stores v. Dukes, was
thrown out, Ms. Duke’s legal effort helped draw attention to the working
conditions of low-paid workers in so-called big box stores that dominate the
retail landscape.
Ms. Dukes was born on March 17, 1950, in Tallulah, La., one of 12 children.
She did not graduate from high school but later earned an equivalency diploma
and attended college.
In the 1990s, Ms. Dukes, an ordained Baptist minister, lobbied successfully
to remove adult books and videos from the view and reach of children at her
neighborhood grocery store, according to the website of Betty Dukes Ministry
Foundation.
She started working for Walmart in 1994, earning
$5.50 an hour. When she filed the lawsuit in 2001, she worked at a store in
Pittsburg, Calif, about 30 miles east of Oakland,
where many of the store’s employees included recent immigrants from Mexico and
the Philippines.
“Betty was out to help the little person, the people were afraid to rock
the boat,” said her sister-in-law Sundrena Ponnell, who worked with Ms. Dukes at Walmart
when the lawsuit was filed.
Ms. Dukes is survived by five siblings. She had no children and lived in
senior housing in Antioch. She was found dead when a relative went to check on
her after she had not answered her phone.
Ms. Dukes was celebrated as a hero by workers’ rights groups across the
country, but day-to-day reality was not always easy for her.
“It is a difficult thing to go into work knowing you were fighting against
the very company where you have made your career,” Ms. Roland said.
Ms. Dukes established her foundation to support female workers and “the
marginalized striving for upward mobility.” She was active in her church and
organized celebrations at a local restaurant for President Barack Obama’s inaugurations.
Even after the legal case fizzled, Ms. Dukes continued to work at Walmart because she had grown close to many of the
customers and workers, whom she counseled about workplace issues, Ms. Roland
said.
“It was her family, away from her family,” she said.